HUH!! I Didnt know that?

Matt6781

Active Expediter
Hello All-
Found this site cause my engine blew with led to a new to me car that had XM active(going on 16 months!) which led to Channel 106 which led to terms being used like "FMCSA" "CSA" "Expedited Freight" etc. All terms which led to me googling and finding myself interested/drawn to this type of trucking. Since I am more of a task oriented personalality.

Which leads to this- Getting coffee at the same place for several years see the same people usually. A coffee aquaintence asked me to meet him for lunch- rather odd IMO, but OK. He makes me a business proposition. (Basically- give him a price to follow an generic looking Tractor-Trailer from Point A to Point B. Approx 475 miles there and drop the trailer- Counter sign to paper-work, and then call him.) Price/Terms given. Agreed to price not even batting an eye!! Hand Shake given(My word is my bond...I know contracts etc) Done 5 trips personally, and 5 had colleagues do. WOW. Extremely HIGH value cargo.

Which lead me to this. THEFT of Cargo. Theft of Trailers Vans and Reefers(sp). Theft of Truck Tires. I dont deal with these issues. So my question lead me to talk to other LEO's who have experience in this area or sizable truck traffic thru there jurisdictions. (BTW- I was amazed at the size of the testosterone producing organs some of these thieves have exhibited)

Which leads to this question: Is there so much money on the other side of trucking i.e. fleet operators/owners etc that not an eye is batted or nobbody gets upset by this?

Im sorry about the rambling post. LOL and this was the condensed version!
 
Last edited:

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
For a short time, I did some wide load escorts (pilot car work). Much of that work is done by wives & friends of the driver. If someone's going to get paid, why not keep the money in-house, right? But I wondered the same as you--where's all this money coming from? Doesn't it eat into a driver's take? This was a few years before I got into the industry and saw how parasite industries like lumping function. But as I learned, it all gets passed up the chain to the customer. It's all part of the cost of doing business and is eventually added to the retail cost.

--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

Monty

Expert Expediter
High value escorts, (nothing to do with wide loads), usually involves the shipper paying the additional fee.

In the case of some government stuff, they send their own agents on the escort duty.

(It's fun to work them to death, with co-drivers on a semi, and a cruising range of, say, 1200 miles before fuel, those escort cars run low much quicker ... and the escorts squirm for the bathrooms!)
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Welcome to EO,

My experience is this;

High Value escorts that are used on serious loads are vetted, usually former military with a security clearance and bonded. The one thing I am told is they don't seem to like former or active LEOs for some reason.

There are a couple companies who provide this level of service, not many and they don't have their employees talking about it in public which is why you don't hear about it.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
High value escorts, (nothing to do with wide loads), usually involves the shipper paying the additional fee.

In the case of some government stuff, they send their own agents on the escort duty.

(It's fun to work them to death, with co-drivers on a semi, and a cruising range of, say, 1200 miles before fuel, those escort cars run low much quicker ... and the escorts squirm for the bathrooms!)

I'm just saying, the cost is figured in ahead of time, and goes back up the chain.

--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

Matt6781

Active Expediter
[This was a few years before I got into the industry and saw how parasite industries like lumping function. You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.

Lumpers? Is that right? Guy who unload ya for a fee? Whats that cost ya? From what Im learning/hearing...Who doesnt have there hand in your pocket?
 

Monty

Expert Expediter
Greenville, Texas to Northern Virginia is a long way! Even when they have three men in the Suburban! Staying awake was not their problem! ;)
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
[This was a few years before I got into the industry and saw how parasite industries like lumping function. You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.

Lumpers? Is that right? Guy who unload ya for a fee? Whats that cost ya? From what Im learning/hearing...Who doesnt have there hand in your pocket?

I've been charged up to $350 before. Sometimes it's a (relatively) legit service, others are outright scams. The deal is, only non-employee private contractors are supposed to lump, though now there are lumping companies that may have employees; I've been out of big trucks for a while so I'm not up on the recent developments. Anyway, some consignees use or used this setup to charge truckers to have their truck unloaded. For example, in NYC, where I was charged $350... The "lumper" who charged $350 to unload me (which was paid by my company, who in turn charged the customer) was actually an employee of the company where I delivered. So they had him pose as a lumper to collect the $350 and then he went back to being a regular employee. I was ****ed off about it, though it wasn't coming out of my pocket. I told my company, but they didn't care. It's how the game is/was played, and all the players knew it.

To top it off, had I chosen to unload the trailer myself, my company would have paid me $75, but they had no problem paying the receiver $350 to do it. And had I decided to do it, the consignee would have made it as difficult as possible. They want the $350, my company was willing to pay it...


--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Hello All-
Found this site cause my engine blew with led to a new to me car that had XM active(going on 16 months!) which led to Channel 106 which led to terms being used like "FMCSA" "CSA" "Expedited Freight" etc. All terms which led to me googling and finding myself interested/drawn to this type of trucking. Since I am more of a task oriented personalality.

[h=2]Re: What is distracted driving?[/h]10-05-2011, 10:32 P.M.
First post here, and had to chime in on this on. Found this sight after seeing a strange FedEx straight truck with a sleeper around the 4th of July delivering to the Sears/Willis Tower. Turned out thru google I found "ATeam" then this site.


The whole story would take a pot of coffee.

Or coffee full of pot.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Just a question, are you a convicted pedifile or something and got busted by the police...is that why you slam them on every post you make...does that make you feel good...just askin'

Don't know what a pediphile is. Actually, I do. At least you didn't try to spell it "petiphile," which I've seen. The closest I've come to being arrested is making an illegal right turn on red (didn't see the sign) in 1987. Technically, that's an arrest, but not what we consider being arrested.

I used to like cops. Years ago, when I was in the military and unmarried, I even had the local Patrolmen's Assoc. as a beneficiary on my life insurance. I admired cops. But that was, for all intents and purposes, a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. That was before cops went on the federal dole, got all sorts of cool toys from military surplus and decided they were soldiers, strutting around in BDUs and ski masks. That was before the notion that "officer safety" trumps the Bill of Rights. That was before cops were issued tasers and began to view them as the answer to all their problems. That was before Officer Friendly--if a school even had a cop in it at all--became an intimidating paramilitary thug. That was before cops started hauling children out of school in handcuffs for drawing on their desk (back before I developed a distrust of cops, they would have told a principal if he ever called them back for that, they'd arrest him for filling a false or frivolous police report). That was before cops threatened to execute citizens who were LEGALLY carrying a gun, aimed their pistol in a drive-thru window because of a dispute over the food or service, murdered people in cold blood only to be given a paid vacation followed by a whitewash sham of an investigation, and before they took to choking paramedics while they were on a call and later saying they were about to draw their gun in the incident.

Cops have changed. Not for the better. I don't trust them any more than I would an imperial stormtrooper. And that includes my cousins who are cops.

Cops who want violence so bad should go down to the recruiter's office and sign up to be sent to Afghanistan, or Iran, soon enough. If they want to serve and protect their community, they can do so by being a PEACE OFFICER who respects the Bill of Rights, not an LEO.
--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
I feel so so sorry for you...as you must have had a traumatic experience at some point in your life and you obviously require counseling, it also probably effects your ability to drive a truck. It is anti socials like you that force big brother to watch the rest of us. Yes there are bad cops, as well as doctors, nurses, lawyers, indian chiefs...and yes truck drivers...full of road rage, about everything and everyone........I for one hope I never have to drive around you, or am in the mall nearby...when you snap and go off...

It amazes me that those are the conclusions you draw, especially after all the examples I gave (yes, they are all actual, recent occurrences). You remind me of the friend with whom I watched a military movie--the one with gunnery sergeant Hartman. After seeing the first half, he said, "Now THAT'S how basic training should be! They should be allowed to throw us through windows!" Only, apparently, you see no problem with violent cops abusing us. At least when you join the military, you know you're putting yourself in a situation in which others will exercise an inordinate amount of authority over you and whose actions may resemble mistreatment, and you chose that. Outside of the military, we are government's boss, not the other way around.

Instead of saying there should be no Big Brother, you say someone who objects to Big Brother is the justification for Big Brother. Now THAT'S the reasoning that sounds like mental illness.

--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.
 

mxzane933

Seasoned Expediter
Putting people down is really cool dieseldriver actually should it be debbie downer #kneeslap

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using EO Forums
 

cableguymn

Seasoned Expediter
It amazes me that those are the conclusions you draw, especially after all the examples I gave (yes, they are all actual, recent occurrences). You remind me of the friend with whom I watched a military movie--the one with gunnery sergeant Hartman. After seeing the first half, he said, "Now THAT'S how basic training should be! They should be allowed to throw us through windows!" Only, apparently, you see no problem with violent cops abusing us. At least when you join the military, you know you're putting yourself in a situation in which others will exercise an inordinate amount of authority over you and whose actions may resemble mistreatment, and you chose that. Outside of the military, we are government's boss, not the other way around.

Instead of saying there should be no Big Brother, you say someone who objects to Big Brother is the justification for Big Brother. Now THAT'S the reasoning that sounds like mental illness.

--

You know the problem with bad cops? They make the other 5% look bad.

you forgot breaking down the door of the wrong house on a no knock warrant and shooting the family dog.

This has happened many.. many times.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
OK...it is obvious there is no reasoning with a jaded person like you, and jousting with the uninformed is no fun...as Ron White stated..."You can't fix stupid"...

You apparently were uninformed about the fact that all those incidents I mentioned were real. I'm not uninformed; you are, and probably as much by design as anything else. You see/hear/speak no evil about cops because...

You see I am a retired police officer, decorated, with honors, with 21 proud years of service to my community...

I knew it was something like that, but I was guessing you were a cop's wide, because of your emotional, irrational rah-rah, hear-no-evil, acknowledge no facts defense of the thin blue line through thick or thin. But that you were an actual cop makes sense, too. You're defending your brothers regardless of any facts, and though I could bury you in incidents that show that cops have changed and are no longer defensible, it wouldn't matter; you won't listen to the facts no matter what.

and I was offended by your signature lines,

All this offense on this forum lately! It's at an all-time high, it seems. That's why I thought you were a cop's wife, the way you're taking it.

You remind me of a woman on a trucking forum where we were discussing training and training companies. Her husband worked for Werner, where you can become a road trainer, training other rookies when you have only 6 months of experience in a big truck, yourself--iow, a rookie training a rookie! Some of us objected to that setup, and this woman was mega-offended. We has insulted her husband, in her mind. I pointed out that it was nothing against her husband personally, but no one with only 6 months of experience in a big truck is qualified to train others, even if he's the best 6-month-tenured driver on the face of the earth. That didn't mollify her. I had insulted her man and she was offended, and she unsubscribed in a huff, emotional and offended, not listening to reason, which, apart from the unsubscribing, is what you appear to be doing. I've attacked you and your fellow officers on that thin blue line! How offensive!

when you have no idea what you are talking about.

It's not a matter of knowing what I'm talking about. I've cited but a few examples (of multiple thousands) that show that the nature of cops has changed, examples you appear to have been unaware were factual. Those examples being what they are, my judgment is what it is. So it's not an issue of being uninformed.

I've been critical of cops in numerous threads on here, and passed up opportunities to criticize them on many occasions on which I've read of police abuse and thought maybe I'd post it here but decided not to. If you'd care to do a search for them and point out in them where I'm uninformed, that'd be great. I'd love to read your opinion on them, and maybe you'd eventually read enough to make you wonder if maybe I'm right, that cops have changed (though I doubt it, because I suspect your situation makes you biased to the point that cops could be clubbing people at random in front of you for no legit reason, and you'd still rationalize it; that's a recognized phenomenon among cops).

the bottom line is...if you don't have anything good to say about someone, don't say anything at all..

That's an asinine statement.

Alright, as a final parting shot, lets get this straight, according to you...All cops are bad, so we should get rid of them...

A bit of a stretch, but in general, cops who won't adhere to standards or the Bill of Rights must go, yes...

All military is bad, so we should get rid of them...

Haven't said that, but being that the military has no legit role inside the states unless we're under attack, it's a wholly separate issue.

Now you have gotten rid of all of your protection and the BAD guy is coming for you...Whatcha gonna do...boy, whatcha gonna do...

First, I don't rely on cops for protection. Courts have ruled cops have no such duty. Though they sometimes protect, it's as much an accident as anything else when it happens.

Cops are usually called after something happens, to pick up the pieces. Looking around, I don't see a cop anywhere. If some crazy man is about to bash through my window with a hammer and attack me, no cop will stop him. It's up to me, like it is well over 99% of the time.

If that hammer-wielding crazy man does attack and I choose to call the police, I'll be happy if they arrive in time to arrest him, happier yet if I'm unhurt. But as a saying goes, "There's no human tragedy so awful that it can't be made worse by the presence of a policeman." Lots and lots of people call cops for help and end up getting helped to death, or raped by a cop, as in a case that made the news recently. Or protected and served to death, like many survivors of Katrina. So if I was unhurt, maybe I wouldn't call at all.

It wasn't always like this, but lately, calling the cops is frequently an example of the cure being worse than the disease.

As for what to do once we get rid of the bad apples, that's unfortunately a drawn-out process, so it's not like all the bad cops are going to disappear overnight. But we'd want to replace them in whatever number we in society desired. But it would give us a chance to revamp the hiring and training process to stop recruiting psychopaths and training to produce psychopaths, and instead inculcate in the cadets a proper respect for their masters--civilians--and especially the Bill of Rights.

Your thinking has no rational...lets see a few planes have crashed...get rid of the planes, a lot of cars have crashed, killing hundreds of thousands per year...get rid of the cars...

Though the analogy between human and inanimate object is flawed, the principle is similar--get roid (a typo, but a convenient one) of the defective ones, yes. But in the case of cops, society has of late intentionally recruited defective cops and trained to ingrain the defect. There's the first fix right there.

see where this is going...I both apologize, and regret getting into a banter with such an uninformed person...

I have demonstrated myself to be quite informed on the matter, while you are reacting out of emotion and offense. If you put those aside, we can approach the matter rationally. If I have time, I hope I can find the blog I sometimes read that's written by a retired Chicago cop who sometimes writes about the same things I do--how cops have changed from his day, and not for the better. He has a photo of himself in his uniform back when he was a cop, and a photo of a paramilitary thug in combat gear who calls himself a cop, and feels disgust.

You want to be a soldier, go to the marine recruiting office. You want to help people, put down the roids and the attitude and the taser and be an honorable, respectable PEACE OFFICER, not a g.d. LEO soldier-wannabe who finds the streets of America safer to practice his psychopathy than Afghanistan.

As a cop said in response to a reporter:

Reporter: "Officer, do you expect violence here today?"

Cop: "I certainly hope so."






2012: Ron Paul or not at all.
The lesser of two evils is still evil.
 
Top