Homeschooling a "straight jacket" on children

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Or it came up again and I chose to mention it but it doesn't really matter as I don't have to satisfy anyone with my posts except the admin group.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Like I have an opinion on homeschooling BUT I'm not even gonna read the article because it'll make me wanna voice said opinion lol
You ain't missing anything ... it's basically just a rehash of an article Leo already posted awhile back ...
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
. . . it doesn't really matter as I don't have to satisfy anyone with my posts except the admin group.

So in other words what you are saying is that you are basically a suck up.
:p
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Basically what I'm saying is my posts have to be acceptable or they'll get tossed or worst case I'll get tossed. If that's your definition of sucking up then I guess it is.
 

WanderngFool

Active Expediter
Turtle already slaughtered me in one debate this month, I'm opinion less until at least April or may lol

Don't let the likes of Turtle get to you. Every forum has one or two that bide their time and look for their chance to pounce. It makes them feel superior. But the real superiority is original thought. As we used to say many moons ago, keep the faith!
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Don't let the likes of Turtle get to you. Every forum has one or two that bide their time and look for their chance to pounce. It makes them feel superior. But the real superiority is original thought. As we used to say many moons ago, keep the faith!
Bide their time to look for the chance to pounce. How original. <snort>

Yeah, that's what I've been doing, biding my time, waiting for Leo to post the Wunderlich Family story... again.

The only thing I pounce on are hypocrisy, and lies. That's it.

Back in August when Leo posted the same topic by the same author, it was lambasted and refuted by many members here. My comments in that thread addressed solely the author of the piece and the topic. And did so without a word towards Leo at all. Others did, but I didn't.

But now that he's revisited the subject, with another piece by the same author, I stand by my original reply in this thread, that he's either deliberately spreading lies and hate (because the post shows intent to do so), or he has gotten so senile that he didn't remember the story the first time he read it, nor did he remember posting about here. Going out and finding three more takes on the story to justify this thread, despite there already having been four takes on the story posted in my reply of August 23rd, shows both senility and intent to spread lies and hate.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Basically what I'm saying is my posts have to be acceptable or they'll get tossed or worst case I'll get tossed. If that's your definition of sucking up then I guess it is.

I'm still amazed advocating killing people is acceptable.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using EO Forums mobile app
 
Top