Hillary gets offered a shoe.

[aristotle]

No doubt, the security detail around Mrs. Clinton is about to get much tighter.

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/04/11/video-shoe-thrown-at-hillary-clinton-during-speech

 

[LDB]

What she really should be given is the boot.

 

[KickStarter6]

There's no reason to actually try to physically attack someone, especially a politician. Next thing you know they'll ban shoes and well have to have either chips in our shoes so the government knows they're on or well be barefoot

 

[layoutshooter]

Waste of a good shoe.

 

[Moot]

Hillary is lucky there were not any members of the Revolutionary Anarchist Bowling League (RABL) present in the audience. When a RABL member throws something, it ain't a shoe.

 

[layoutshooter]

"There's no reason to actually try to physically attack someone, especially a politician."


There are PLENTY of reasons to attack people, and more so in the case of many politicians. Consider how much better off the world would have been without Hitler taking control, or Stalin. Consider how much better off tens of thousands American Japanese, Italian and German would have been without FDR. How about never having the "Trail of Tears"?

Throwing a shoe at Hillary was a waste of time. Politicians are the biggest threat to our freedom and our Constitution. There may come a time when violence is needed to restore what is being taken from us. We are not there yet, but are heading in that direction.

 

[KickStarter6]

"There's no reason to actually try to physically attack someone, especially a politician."


There are PLENTY of reasons to attack people, and more so in the case of many politicians. Consider how much better off the world would have been without Hitler taking control, or Stalin. Consider how much better off tens of thousands American Japanese, Italian and German would have been without FDR. How about never having the "Trail of Tears"?

Throwing a shoe at Hillary was a waste of time. Politicians are the biggest threat to our freedom and our Constitution. There may come a time when violence is needed to restore what is being taken from us. We are not there yet, but are heading in that direction.

In a case of war yes but to just randomly throw a show is stupid on the person that throw the shoe. Now if my life or family members that I care for life is in danger then hell yeah I'm gonna kick somedays teeth down their throat or die trying.


But seriously, who throws a shoe?

 

[layoutshooter]

In a case of war yes but to just randomly throw a show is stupid on the person that throw the shoe. Now if my life or family members that I care for life is in danger then hell yeah I'm gonna kick somedays teeth down their throat or die trying.


But seriously, who throws a shoe?

No body with a brain.

What about the idea that wars could have been stopped if the likes of a Hitler was "removed" before he could do what he did?

 

[KickStarter6]

No body with a brain.

What about the idea that wars could have been stopped if the likes of a Hitler was "removed" before he could do what he did?

My only retort to that is: What if someone worse took his place? Dang that is a hard thought but it's possible. What if someone off'd Hitler and the guy didn't invade Russian? Then it's plausible the axis take England then come after the US from at least 2 sides Japanese from the west and Germany Italy from the east. Possibly could have convinced the Mexicans to join and/or other South American countries. Then the US and Canada would have been S.O.L.

 

[layoutshooter]

My only retort to that is: What if someone worse took his place? Dang that is a hard thought but it's possible. What if someone off'd Hitler and the guy didn't invade Russian? Then it's plausible the axis take England then come after the US from at least 2 sides Japanese from the west and Germany Italy from the east. Possibly could have convinced the Mexicans to join and/or other South American countries. Then the US and Canada would have been S.O.L.

What about stopping FDR from interning law abiding citizens and confiscating their property? Is there a point where putting a stop to what a politician is doing, by force, is warranted?

 

[KickStarter6]

Yeah there is but as to when that is I dunno

 

[layoutshooter]

Yeah there is but as to when that is I dunno

Got it. That point is different for everyone. Should FDR have been stopped when he illegally interned US citizens? Should Jackson have been stopped prior to the "Trail of Tears"?

 

[KickStarter6]

Depends on a lot of variables that I personally am not smart enough to figure out. Doesn't mean I could figure it out by having an event that caused me to react

 

[layoutshooter]

Depends on a lot of variables that I personally am not smart enough to figure out. Doesn't mean I could figure it out by having an event that caused me to react

Is there ever a point where a politician is right to act illegally?

 

[JohnWC]

lol I think big deal it didn't hit her

 

[ntimevan]

Hmmm

Sent from my SGH-M919 using EO Forums mobile app

 

[cheri1122]

My only retort to that is: What if someone worse took his place? Dang that is a hard thought but it's possible. What if someone off'd Hitler and the guy didn't invade Russian? Then it's plausible the axis take England then come after the US from at least 2 sides Japanese from the west and Germany Italy from the east. Possibly could have convinced the Mexicans to join and/or other South American countries. Then the US and Canada would have been S.O.L.

You do know that "removing someone before he could do what he did" is exactly what our entire legal system is meant to prevent?
It's called vigilantism, and we don't want it, for good reason.