From the "You Can't Make It Up Department"

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Lancelot_Link_l.jpg



(Reuters) - A U.S. animal rights group on Monday filed what it said is the first lawsuit seeking to establish the "legal personhood" of chimpanzees.

The non-profit Nonhuman Rights Project asked a New York state court to declare a 26-year-old chimp named Tommy "a cognitively complex autonomous legal person with the fundamental legal right not to be imprisoned."

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that Tommy's "detention" in a "small, dank, cement cage in a cavernous dark shed" in central New York is unlawful and demands his immediate release to a primate sanctuary.

Chimpanzees "possess complex cognitive abilities that are so strictly protected when they're found in human beings," Steven Wise, the president of Nonhuman Rights Project, told Reuters.

"There's no reason why they should not be protected when they're found in chimpanzees," he added.

The lawsuit states that chimps are entitled to a "fundamental right to bodily liberty," which Wise told Reuters is the basic right to be left alone and not held for entertainment or research.

The lawsuit was filed at "the earliest point at which we have some reasonable chance at winning," said Wise, a well-known animal rights activist and author of books including the 2000 title "Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals."

"These are the first cases in an open-ended, strategic litigation campaign," he said. "We're just going to keep filing suits."

Nonhuman Rights Project in 2007 began a nationwide search for an optimal venue to file the lawsuits, Wise said. New York was ultimately chosen because of its generally flexible view of requests for a writ of habeas corpus, the centuries-old right in English law to challenge unlawful detention, he said.

David Favre, a professor at Michigan State University College of Law and an expert on animal law, said it is the first habeas petition filed on behalf of an animal.

"The focus here is whether a chimpanzee is a 'person' that has access to these laws," said Favre.
The full Reuters story here: New York lawsuit seeks 'legal personhood' for chimpanzees | Reuters

Here's a more in-depth article from the Boston Globe (Should chimpanzees have legal rights?) that gives a lot more detail into the reasoning (and obsession) of personhood for certain animals, the precedents for giving non-humans personhood status (corporations, ships, etc) and for having animals sued in court, as well as the significant problems of doing so. The article was written back in July, predicting what was to occur in a New York courtroom today. It'll be interesting the first time a chimp or a dolphin or an elephant gets charged with assault and battery, or some other crime. :D
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
The last statistic that I seen was that 48 percent of all people with a law degree are unemployed.
Looks like future lawyers are trying to create some self & future employment.

gangstaChimp23.jpg
 
Last edited:

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Yeah, and probably some or many of the same people have no problem with abortion although they demand rights for chimps.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
In all there are three lawsuits involving four chimps. The name of one of the chimps is Leo.
 
Last edited:

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Would the chimp gain 2nd amendment privileges?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Ummm???? There is a thought to ponder?:eek:

I intentionally left that part of the article out of the quoted text, knowing that most people would read what I posted and wouldn't click through to the full article. I did that to prevent someone from making some convoluted off-topic, stupid, asinine comment. It didn't work.
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Not all that new a trend. People now "adopt" pets and become "pet parents". When I was younger people were parents to their children, not their dogs or cats. Kinda weird if you ask me.
 

roadeyes

Veteran Expediter
Charter Member
After 47 years, my experiences in this world have led me to the conclusion that the dumbest animal is smarter than the majority of people on this planet.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
After 47 years, my experiences in this world have led me to the conclusion that the dumbest animal is smarter than the majority of people on this planet.


The more we become grazers the more that trend will continue. Grazers are prey animals, easily controlled and eaten. Predators rule. "Sheeple" fit the mold of grazer.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
After 47 years, my experiences in this world have led me to the conclusion that the dumbest animal is smarter than the majority of people on this planet.
After reading comments, in this thread, about abortion and grazers, I have to agree.
 
Top