Excerpts from Mark Twain's "Innocents Abroad."

aristotle

Veteran Expediter
Celebrated American author Mark Twain wrote of his travels to the Holy Land in 1867. His book "Innocents Abroad" published in 1869 chronicle those travels and was written in a time before modern political correctness corrupted thought and free speech. This virtue, in and of itself, make Clemens' work worth reading.

His observations made in 1867 might not get the greenlight from a publisher in contemporary times. Here are samples from "Innocents Abroad"

www.handbookforinfidels.com/Mark-Twain-on-Islam.html


MARK TWAIN ON MUSLIMS
 
Last edited:

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Not entirely surprising that this little diatribe was compiled by a Baptist Bible-thumper ... in my own personal experience, some - but certainly not all by any means - Baptists are some of the most venomous, hateful, intolerant, and utterly hypocritical (so-called) "Christians" that I've ever had the dubious pleasure of meeting ...

I'm just wondering though ... since you seem to have some respect for the compiler's competence in selection and compiling - as well as his editorial commentary - do you also hold with the compiler's following assessments (circa 2003) that:

"The unilateral action of the United States in its aggressive invasion of Iraq in the face of worldwide opposition is a radical reversal of this nation’s foreign policy - never to strike the first blow. It is also a rejection of the high ideals of Christianity upon which this nation was founded."

Taking the low ground in starting this war ignores the ancient admonition, “In fighting a dragon, beware lest you become a dragon.” America, as the world’s superpower, should be setting the example for best behavior. Instead, it is on its way to becoming a domineering bully and an imperialistic tyrant.

America’s rationale for starting the war is pure hypocrisy: declaring war on Iraq for ignoring United Nations resolutions, all the while ignoring the United Nations’ prohibitions against making the war.

The President of the United States has been totally inept in staging this war. He should have been building a strong coalition of friendly powers, instead of offending former allies with his arrogance and lack of diplomacy. The world now hates America because of its preference for military action over diplomacy, double standards in trade policy, and rejection of United Nations resolutions and treaties most countries want (global warming, landmine removal, rights of women and children, and the International Criminal Court).
Personally, I think he's a little short or slow on the uptake ... if he thinks the United States is simply ... "on its way to becoming a domineering bully and an imperialistic tyrant.
 
Last edited:

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
A smart lawyer knows the answer to a question before he asks it, and likewise a smart traveler (or advocate) knows where his destination is before he goes ...

Knowledge and cognizance of the terrain that lies ahead allows one to plan his route and thereby hopefully avert disaster ...

Fools however - being fools - carelessly tread in places where they know not ...

Celebrated American author Mark Twain wrote of his travels to the Holy Land in 1867. His book "Innocents Abroad" published in 1869 chronicle those travels and was written in a time before modern political correctness corrupted thought and free speech.
Oh really ?

This virtue, in and of itself, make Clemens' work worth reading.
Well then, by all means: read on ... and drink deep of this "virtue" which you apparently admire:

Mark Twain and the Jews

Mark Twain was another writer whose work on the Jews was filled with antisemitic stereotypes.[1] Providing an insight into the origins of his anti-Jewish feelings, Twain wrote: "I was raised to a prejudice against Jews--Christians always are, you know--but such as I had was in my head, there wasn't any in my heart."[2] In Hannibal, Missouri, where Twain grew up, the children were subjected to antisemitism in public and Sunday school, the town newspapers, and many, no doubt, by their parents.[3] In November 1853, a sixteen-year-old Twain wrote from Philadelphia that the Jewish presence had "desecrated" two historic homes there. And in a newspaper article of 10 April 1857 he asserted that "the blasted Jews got to adulterating the fuel." Although he later indicated that his experience taught him that Jews were not the evil characters he had been taught as a child, in 1879 he observed that "the Jews are the only race who work wholly with their brains and never with their hands. . . . They are peculiarly and conspicuously the world's intellectual aristocracy." In other words, he still stereotyped Jews, ignoring the realities of impoverished Jews and exploited Jewish labor in American cities.[4]

In his famous essay, "Concerning the Jews,"[5] written in 1898 and first published in _Harper's Monthly_ in September 1899, Twain claimed to be free of antisemitism and to be writing in defense of Jews.[6] Although he praised the Jews for their charity, close family life, hard work, and "genius,"[7] he repeated the slander that the Jews had an "unpatriotic disinclination to stand by the flag as a soldier."[8] (Up to 10,000 Jews may have fought in the Civil War--a much higher proportion than their percentage of the general population.[9]) His solution was for regiments of Jews and Jews only to enlist in the army so as to prove false the charge that "you feed on a country but don't like to fight for it."[10] In reaction to angry letters from American Jews who read the essay, Twain retracted this statement in a postscript and noted that despite having to endure American antisemitism, Jews fought widely and bravely in America's wars. Therefore, "that slur upon the Jew cannot hold up its head in presence of the figures of the War Department."[11]

In the same essay, Twain ignored historical realities to recount how the Jews had cheated, exploited, and dominated poor and ignorant Christians in the American South, Tzarist Russia, and medieval England, Spain, and Austria. "There was no way to successfully compete with [the Jew] in any vocation, the law had to step in and save the Christian from the poorhouse. . . . Even the seats of learning . . . had to be closed against this tremendous antagonist. [The Jew] has made it the end and aim of his life to get [money]."[12]

Twain's essay also describes how he wrote to the editor of the _Encyclopedia Britannica_ ten years earlier to contest the encyclopedia's claim that only a quarter of a million Jews lived in the United States. Twain was sure that one hundred times more Jews lived in America than the encyclopedia admitted. He felt that the Jewish population figures were underreported because the Jews masqueraded as Christians for business purposes.[13] "Look at the city of New York; and look at Boston, Philadelphia [and several other cities]--how your race swarms in those places!--and everywhere else in America, down to the least little village. . . . I may, of course, be mistaken, but I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America."[14]

Twain opposed Theodor Herzl's plan for a homeland for the Jews in Palestine. He argued that "if that concentration of the cunningest brains in the world was going to be made in a free country . . . , I think it would be politic to stop it. It will not be well to let that race find out its strength."[15] His analysis compares with that of Adolf Hitler, who also opposed Zionism: "All they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks."[16]

For Twain, there was evidently no place in this world for the Jews, either within Palestine or outside it. At the close of his essay, he observed that the Jews would always be unwanted and disliked aliens wherever they lived outside of their own land. "By his make and ways [the Jew] is substantially a foreigner wherever he may be, and even the angels dislike a foreigner. I am using this word foreigner in the German sense--stranger. . . . You [Jews] will always be by ways and habits and predilections substantially strangers--foreigners-- wherever you are, and that will probably keep the race prejudice against you alive."[17]

The research of Charles Glock and Rodney Stark has made clear that the fundamental basis of the distorted image of the American Jew was religious anti-Jewishness. Without the centuries of Christian Judaeophobia, these literary defamations of Jews would most likely not have been written nor would most of the creators and caretakers of the American literary imagination, their work, and their readers have been contaminated. This antisemitic vision of the Jew carried forward on the wings of secular literature has been so powerful that in the end it has helped persuade most people that the real Jew is identical with the fictitious one. And this belief has all too easily served as a pretext for hostile attitudes and harmful behavior toward Jews.
Original article, including all footnotes, at link below:

Mark Twain and the Jews
 

aristotle

Veteran Expediter
Actually, all chapters of "Innocents Abroad" are good. Twain's travels through Spain, France Greece, Turkey and much of the Middle East are detailed with keen observation and humor. Twain includes serious social commentary at times as seen through the eyes of a man living in the 1860's. No doubt, Twain's gift for language will be admired and emulated for centuries more.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Assuming an interest in early film ... and a nostalgia and yearning for the classical racism of earlier times, I would think D. W. Griffith's Birth of a Nation might be a real high interest item ... if that's where one's tastes truly lie ...

 

Greg

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Actually, all chapters of "Innocents Abroad" are good. Twain's travels through Spain, France Greece, Turkey and much of the Middle East are detailed with keen observation and humor. Twain includes serious social commentary at times as seen through the eyes of a man living in the 1860's. No doubt, Twain's gift for language will be admired and emulated for centuries more.

I really like some of Twain's writings, The Mysterious Stranger comes to mind. I'll have to check this one out.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Celebrated American author Mark Twain wrote of his travels to the Holy Land in 1867. His book "Innocents Abroad" published in 1869 chronicle those travels and was written in a time before modern political correctness corrupted thought and free speech. This virtue, in and of itself, make Clemens' work worth reading.

His observations made in 1867 might not get the greenlight from a publisher in contemporary times. Here are samples from "Innocents Abroad"

www.handbookforinfidels.com/Mark-Twain-on-Islam.html


MARK TWAIN ON MUSLIMS
It doesn't take much effort to find that conditions and attitudes in a lot of these Muslim countries haven't changed much since 1867 - Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, and most any other Muslim controlled country in Africa. Of course there are others like Saudi Arabia that have used their oil-based affluence and Western-educated leaders to modernize the physical aspects of their countries, but the influence of Sharia law hasn't changed much.

On a related note, it appears that the barbarians of Boko Haram are now willing to negotiate an exchange for the 200 schoolgirls they recently kidnapped. All they want is for their "brethren" to be released from prisons in Nigeria and other surrounding countries. Even with the backward conditions that still exist in these countries, it's hard to believe that these Muslim terrorists are tolerated in this day and age.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
On a related note, it appears that the barbarians of Boko Haram are now willing to negotiate an exchange for the 200 schoolgirls they recently kidnapped. All they want is for their "brethren" to be released from prisons in Nigeria and other surrounding countries. Even with the backward conditions that still exist in these countries, it's hard to believe that these Muslim terrorists are tolerated in this day and age.
Yes it is ... that these savages are willing to engage in and resort to brutal, violent ... negotiations ... clearly shows them for the subhuman filth that they are ...

Undoubtedly far, far worse than say the Christians in the BBC documentary below ... who roasted, and in some cases apparently, ate, their Muslim victims that they had recently slaughtered ..

BBC World Service - Assignment , Jos: A city still divided
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
It doesn't take much effort to find that conditions and attitudes in a lot of these Muslim countries haven't changed much since 1867...
It goes back much further than that, to about 1250. As Twain in his book, and as others have similarly commented on, there is a stark absence of technological advancement and a general ignorance in most Muslim countries. It didn't used to be that way. The Qu'ran was penned in the late 600s. Between 750 and 1250 we had what is known as the Golden Age of Science, and it took place in the heart of Muslim Land, in Mecca and Baghdad, the primary trading intersection of that side of the world, and within the accepted teachings of Muhammed and the Qu'ran ("The scholar's ink is more sacred than the blood of martyrs.").

During the Golden Age Muslims gave us Arabic numerals, al gebra, al gorithms, and al chemy (all Arabic names). Despite George Bush stupidly and ironically announcing to the world that it was "our God who named the stars," (unless he worshiped Allah) it was the Muslims that gave us the names of most of the stars visible to the eye: Aldebaran, the Andromeda galaxy, Betelgeuse, Deneb, Rigel, Vega, and hundreds more, 75% of all of the stars to this day have Arabic names. Following the Quran's teaching "For every disease, Allah has given a cure," Arab-Islamic doctors furthered the art of surgery, built hospitals, developed pharmacology, and compiled all the world's medical knowledge into comprehensive encyclopedias and the still-in-use-today seminal Canon of Medicine. And they advanced art and architecture beyond what even the mighty Greeks and Romans had begun.

But that all ended rather abruptly when an influential Socrates-esque Islamic philosopher named Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, an important philosopher, theologian, and mystic from 12th century Persia, declared a few things about how Islam should be practiced and how Allah should be worshiped. As the Golden Age ended, Islam spread, and science within died.

Since the end of the Golden Age, not a single major invention or discovery has come from the Muslim world. In the history of the Nobel Prize in sciences, only two have gone to scientists working in Muslim countries, and both of those were peripheral Muslims, at best. Typically throughout the world, every professor at a university will have publications of some kind. There are about 1800 universities in Muslim countries. Less than 20% of those universities have even a single faculty member who has ever published anything. It's truly pathetic.

What al-Ghazali did was, he in effect codified the Islamic religion, essentially banning scientific research as being the work of the devil and contrary to the teachings of Mohammed, thereby stifling and destroying of one of history's greatest intellectual cultures. He invented Sufism, which in simplistic terms is basically a rejection of worldliness and outside influences and a focus on inner spiritualism and complete devotion to God (or Allah, if you like). Al-Ghazali's book Revival of Religious Sciences is considered his most important, and is the seminal work on Sufism. Essentially, any intellectual pursuits you are to undertake are to be limited to learning more about Islam and how to serve Allah. But it was more than that.

Equally important was the unification of competing schools of thought. He unified the tenets of Sufism (which he invented) with those of sharia law, the moral and religious law of Islam. Sharia governs nearly all aspects of human behavior, including not just religious law but also personal matters and secular matters. Al-Ghazali made these compatible with each other. He also unified Sufism with Sunni Islam, the orthodox version of the Islamic religion. By reinforcing Sunnism, sharia, and Sufism within a single philosophy, al-Ghazali out of necessity drew boundaries that excluded any and all competing philosophies, including that of intellectual pursuits.

A large part of this was the rejection of the great Greek philosophers. Greek philosophy was to understand the world; al-Ghazali's was to understand God. Since God created the world, God was all that mattered, and everything else was a distraction from devotion, thus a tool of the devil.

Of course, during the Golden Age the Islamic Empire was continually stretching its reach by conquering other regions and nations, and eventually was spread so thin that geopolitical fractioning took place and the empire began to crumble under its own weight. Mongols to the east fought back, Pope Urban II invented the Crusades and overwhelming armies of Christians and barbarians and anyone else not-Muslim overran and destroyed the great Arab centers. The great irreplaceable libraries were burned, the universities leveled, and the Holy Land fell. Muslims and Jews alike throughout the region were killed in really large numbers.

The only thing that survived was the idea, the philosophy, the ideas of al-Ghazali. The abandonment of intellectualism (of intelligence, really) in favor of pure religious pursuits was reinforced by the Crusades, actually, where amidst death and destruction they turned to Allah. Muslims don't need science, because the Qu'ran aleady has all the answers, even the answers to science. Clerics scour the Qu'ran to find support for all science and they always find it, even new discoveries, because the Qu'ran is infallible. It is the word of Allah.

Ironically, Europe was already immersed in it's own period of forbidding intellectual pursuits, and for the same reasons, in a decree set forth by the Holy Roman Catholic Church, and is a time known as the Dark Ages. The fact that Christians were not to spend a lot of learning time outside of the Bible and Muslims were hot and heavy into science (and therefore gaining power through knowledge) was one of the many factors which prompted the Crusades.

After the smoke cleared between the 14th and 17th centuries, Europe entered its Renaissance (a cultural and intellectual rebirth), while the Arab-Islamic world did not. Why did this happen? Why did Europe move forward and the Arabic world remain stagnant? Just compare the dominant ideologies: Europe's application of philosophy was to understand the world; al-Ghazali's Arabic application was to understand God.

I think there is a massively important lesson to be gleaned from all that.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
I think there is a massively important lesson to be gleaned from all that.
Yup: for some individuals at least, they will allow religion to make them stoopid ...

And the specific flavor of religion really doesn't seem to matter ... it's more the specific flavor of person ...
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Twain's mention of a "common charge against Jews": "You feed on a country, but don't like to fight for it" is particularly unfair, given his recitation of desultory [and entirely inept] participation in his own country's fight, in "The Private History Of A Campaign That Failed".
I have his Autobiography here, [one of the few books I make room for, though it's awfully big, lol]. Clemens forbade it to be published until 100 years after his death, because it contained his real beliefs, and they weren't always a credit to the Christianity his mother taught him, and his wife expected of him. I'll have to see what he had to say on the subject, when he wasn't writing with book sales and lecture tours in mind.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Twain's mention of a "common charge against Jews": "You feed on a country, but don't like to fight for it" is particularly unfair, given his recitation of desultory [and entirely inept] participation in his own country's fight, in "The Private History Of A Campaign That Failed".
Well, given his bigoted, racist inclinations, it wouldn't be at all surprising to find out that he was also a hypocrite.

Moral failings seem almost to be a package deal - choose one each, from column A, B, and C ... appetizer not included ...

I have his Autobiography here, [one of the few books I make room for, though it's awfully big, lol]. Clemens forbade it to be published until 100 years after his death, because it contained his real beliefs, and they weren't always a credit to the Christianity his mother taught him, and his wife expected of him. I'll have to see what he had to say on the subject, when he wasn't writing with book sales and lecture tours in mind.
Interesting ... please report back what you discover if anything ...
 
Top