greg334
Veteran Expediter
I talk about.
Please read this carefully and remember that this comes from a liberal;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/realclearpolitics/20070611/cm_rcp/new_york_times_how_the_mighty
But to sum up the issue here is the last paragraph;
"The coverage given to this alleged war criminal by The Times includes a page-one, above-the-fold column, with an additional half-page article on page 35, conveying The Times' interest in the subject. But on the same front page, there is only a brief note reporting that "four charged in the bomb plot at Kennedy airport" were the subject of an article on page 37. Surely this shows a lack of judgment in selecting articles of importance for the front page. Glaringly so, when on that same front page there was an article on India concerning the new industry of making mud bricks, accompanied by a large color picture, all above the fold. Is The Times aware that New York State provides that adolescents 13 years or older are criminally responsible for certain aggravated criminal conduct?"
Please read this carefully and remember that this comes from a liberal;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/realclearpolitics/20070611/cm_rcp/new_york_times_how_the_mighty
But to sum up the issue here is the last paragraph;
"The coverage given to this alleged war criminal by The Times includes a page-one, above-the-fold column, with an additional half-page article on page 35, conveying The Times' interest in the subject. But on the same front page, there is only a brief note reporting that "four charged in the bomb plot at Kennedy airport" were the subject of an article on page 37. Surely this shows a lack of judgment in selecting articles of importance for the front page. Glaringly so, when on that same front page there was an article on India concerning the new industry of making mud bricks, accompanied by a large color picture, all above the fold. Is The Times aware that New York State provides that adolescents 13 years or older are criminally responsible for certain aggravated criminal conduct?"
