What does everyone think about a carrier that has no regard for your privacy, that wants increasing amounts of information?
One of my companies is apparently building a database of other carriers, by name, that each unit runs for.
I'm not so sure that's their business.
It's good business to make it their business. Is there some reason you don't want the companies you run for to know about the other companies you run for?What does everyone think about a carrier that has no regard for your privacy, that wants increasing amounts of information? One of my companies is apparently building a database of other carriers, by name, that each unit runs for.
I'm not so sure that's their business.
Let's say you're the only van in Armpit, AL. One company is bidding on a load for you, against another company, and it just so happens that you run for both companies. Would you rather have both companies bid the load lower and lower and lower for the same van, or would you rather have them work together to get them and you the highest rate?
Whats up I put those letters in caps and when posted shows up in lower case ?
On some (or maybe many) of the bid boards, the bidding process is rather transparent. Carriers often know who they are bidding against and who won the bid. Some just show the other bids, but some who who placed those bids.When you are a company bidding on a load, how would you know what other companies are also bidding on the load?
You can never be 100% certain, of course, as not all carriers make available where their vans are located. But many carriers make their available van and truck locations known to customers, brokers and other bidders.How would you know that there are no other vans in the area from other companies?
If you mean they're compiling a database of which carriers each O/O is leased to, I don't see that as private, exactly - not when the vehicle has the carrier's name on it, and it's driven in public [where anyone might see them]. The question is, for what purpose are they doing it?
Carpenters and plumbers might not be the best analogy to expediting, since customers will often ask a plumber or carpenter if they have done work for this or that person (or the Smiths in particular), if they haven't in fact already talked with many neighbors to get recommendations for plumbers and carpenters. The Smiths may very well have had some really bad carpentry or plumbing work done, and people may interrogate plumbers and carpenters to ensure they don't get the same level of work.If you're a carpenter or a plumber, does your customer interrogate you as to whether you did any work for the Smiths over on Maple Street?
Carpenters and plumbers might not be the best analogy to expediting, since customers will often ask a plumber or carpenter if they have done work for this or that person (or the Smiths in particular), if they haven't in fact already talked with many neighbors to get recommendations for plumbers and carpenters. The Smiths may very well have had some really bad carpentry or plumbing work done, and people may interrogate plumbers and carpenters to ensure they don't get the same level of work.
I'm guessing here, but if I ran a company, I'd be interested to know if a van I was using also ran for the competition. The more work that van did for the competition, the less I would be inclined to use it when I had a choice. On the flip side, the more a van ran for me, the more inclined I would be to use it when I had a choice.
That crossed my mind, but in this case, what's being requested is names of competitors--with which of our competitors are you doing business? And they're asking contractors, not employees.
What does everyone think about a carrier that has no regard for your privacy, that wants increasing amounts of information? One of my companies is apparently building a database of other carriers, by name, that each unit runs for.
I'm not so sure that's their business.