Canadian Commentator Gets It Right

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Several of us have been saying the same thing for several years, but this guy hits the nail on the head. Not saying McCain would have won, but had it not been for the obvious bias on the part of the MSM, Hillary would have more than likely been the Democrat nominee.

Canadian Commentator: The Press Gave America 'An Untried, Unknown,' 'Incompetent' President

Rex Murphy

Sep 17, 2011 – 7:00 AM ET | LastUpdated: Sep 19, 2011 4:36 PM ET
As the bad economic news continues to emanate from the United States — with a double-dip recession now all but certain — a reckoning is overdue. American journalism will have to look back at the period starting with Barack Obama’s rise, his assumption of the presidency and his conduct in it to the present, and ask itself how it came to cast aside so many of its vital functions. In the main, the establishment American media abandoned its critical faculties during the Obama campaign — and it hasn’t reclaimed them since.
Much of the Obama coverage was orchestrated sycophancy. They glided past his pretensions — when did a presidential candidate before “address the world” from the Brandenberg Gate in Berlin? They ignored his arrogance — “You’re likable enough, Hillary.” And they averted their eyes from his every gaffe — such as the admission that he didn’t speak “Austrian.”
The media walked right past the decades-long association of Obama with the weird and racist pastor Jeremiah Wright. In the midst of the brief stormlet over the issue, one CNN host — inexplicably — decided that CNN was going to be a “Wright-free zone.” He could have hung out a sign: “No bad news about Obama here.”
The media trashed Hillary. They burned Republicans. They ransacked Sarah Palin and her family. But Obama, the cool, the detached, the oracular Obama — he strolled to the presidency.
Palin, in particular, stands out as Obama’s opposite in the media’s eyes. As much as they genuflected to the one, they felt the need to turn rottweiler toward the other. If Obama was sacred , classy, intellectual and cosmopolitan, why then Palin must be malevolent, trashy, dumb and pure backwoods-ignorant.
Every doubt they hid from themselves about Obama, every potential embarrassment they tucked under the blanket of their superior sensibilities, they furiously over-compensated for by their remorseless hounding of Palin — from utterly trivial e-mails, to blogger Andrew Sullivan’s weird speculations about Palin’s womb, musings that put the Obama “Birther” fantasies into a realm near sanity. (We are now seeing an echo of that — with a new book promoting all sorts of unconfirmed gossip about Palin, including her alleged sexual dalliance with a basketball star.)
As a result, the press gave the great American republic an untried, unknown and, it is becoming more and more frighteningly clear, incompetent figure as President. Under Obama, America’s foreign policies are a mixture of confusion and costly impotence. It is increasingly bypassed or derided; the great approach to the Muslim world, symbolized by the Cairo speech, is in tatters. Its debt and deficits are a weight on the entire global economy. And the office of presidency is less and less a symbol of strength.
To the degree the press neglected its function as watchdog and turned cupbearer to a Styrofoam demigod, it is a partner in the flaws and failures of what is turning out to be one of the most miserable performances in the modern history of the American presidency.

Rex Murphy: The media’s love affair with a disastrous president | U.S. Politics | Full Comment | National Post
 

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
Even though she has said no I still think she might challenge Obama.If nothing else We might see a Obama/clinton ticket.That would really be the only hope O has of winning next year and not sure if that would be enogh to do it.Belive most would see it for what it is a ploy.
 

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
I'm thinkin that Hilliary and Biden will be changing job titles shortly after the first of the year!:eek:
 

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
I'm thinkin that Hilliary and Biden will be changing job titles shortly after the first of the year!:eek:

Thats what Im thinking.However this could be what she is waiting for to decide to run on her own.Think about it.

Obama offers her bidens job then she says im running for president what could obama say.It is not like he could say she is not qualified for the job.If he said this then she could counter then why did he put me a heartbeat away from the job?

I belive she would take the nomination from Obama.Heck even Bill is hinting he would like to see her run.More and more of the people on the left are seeing fault with Obama Even his fundraising is down.Dont really see him breaking that 1 billion dollar mark.When it comes down to it she could point out all his failures as president.All his caving to republicans demands,Then HAMMER HOME the message if you leave Obama on the 2012 ticket then the republicans take back the whitehouse.Which is somthing many of them are fearing is going to happen anyway.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
She is not going to run and I doubt very much that she would accept a vp role. People who take that spot usually have designs on the White House and I truly believe she no longer has that desire.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Gee, Just what we need, Hilary. who is either a LIAR or a FELON. Likely BOTH!! They NEED to investigate her based on her campaign statement that she used to read classified document when her hubby was president. THAT IS A FELONY!! She was NOT cleared! She later "recanted" that statement when some one brought that felony thing to her attention.

OH YEAH! IF she was NOT lying about that SHE and BILL should be in prison for that. Not that ANY Dumb-O-Crat would EVER go to jail for criminal activity. ReBumLiCan for that matter. Scum all.
 

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
Gee, Just what we need, Hilary. who is either a LIAR or a FELON. Likely BOTH!! They NEED to investigate her based on her campaign statement that she used to read classified document when her hubby was president. THAT IS A FELONY!! She was NOT cleared! She later "recanted" that statement when some one brought that felony thing to her attention.

OH YEAH! IF she was NOT lying about that SHE and BILL should be in prison for that. Not that ANY Dumb-O-Crat would EVER go to jail for criminal activity. ReBumLiCan for that matter. Scum all.

Feel the same way.I also belive that she would be much more dangerous then O is.Just saying she could take the nomanation from O if she chose to run.There are to many things that the left refuses to even recongnise from the clinton whitehouse that they would crucify a republican for.Heck there have been a few that they have tried on.Still though if clinton were to say she is running BYE BYE OBAMA.
 

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
Plus dont think it matters if its Obama or Clinton. Perry takes the whitehouse.With Cain as the VP.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
You know the problem is hopeful wishing by claiming something that isn't all that true. The press doesn't vote and the press wasn't the only group that trashed the republican candidates in 2008, the republicans did a d*mn good job doing that too.

But the speculation about obama seems to also be wishful thinking, more like wishful desperate thinking. I do not think for a minute the dems will not back him, it is too late to start talking about a replacement and unlike carter, if he doesn't get the nomination and the dems revolt, as they did in '80, the money goes with him and they will have to fill a lot of gaps to recover AND won't recover.

At this point, they see the republican primary forming to show who the repubs want (I think they are going to push hard towards Perry to keep their base happy while they are going to push Romney for VP) so the dems are preparing for that fight while Obama is already campaigning NOW with $35k a plate fundraisers here and there.

Hillary won't be VP, she will wait until 2016 when the republicans screw us and she will step up as the front runner of the pack - she will have a very good track record of embarrassing us on the world stage. I also don't think Biden is going anywhere because he also brings some things to the dems, money is one and some senate seats is another.

So as much as this "Canadian commentator" may have a few things close to correct, he isn't here and he seems to be hopeful that he is right when he is wrong.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Everyone forgets that Hillary's "dislike factor" was over 50% when she was running for the Democrat nomination, and no one has ever won it with that level of personal disapproval. So BHO was running against a weak opponent, but given it was Slick Willie's wife it shows the weakness of her campaign combined with the media bias determined to have a person of color elected president regardless of his lack of qualification and experience. It was the vested interest of the MSM to promote his election because it would be an historic event, and historic events sell newspapers and attract viewers to otherwise failing news programs. By the same token, the MSM wil turn on him in a heartbeat if something like the Solyndra scandal continues to grow legs - scandals also sell newspapers.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Well I don't know about the MSN stuff, Fox too has been the same as MSN so they are all the same. Fox in the last few days has been hitting us with the "Jackson" trial and it is another spectacular scene grabbing crap just like their competitors.

BUT with that said something odd struck me when I read this;

but given it was Slick Willie's wife it shows the weakness of her campaign combined with the media bias determined to have a person of color elected president regardless of his lack of qualification and experience.

I first have to ask, seriously, what makes anyone think that the media wouldn't have been biased against anyone other than Obama?

Before anyone answers this, remember his speech at the 2004 convention?

Remember how the press took it on themselves to be the lead in the Apologetic tour of the US in order to justify our collective self-imposed guilt over our past.

See this means little when people from other countries tell us things we already know but more importantly many seem to be so blind by the problem that we have in our country with race and the apology we continue to make.

The second thing is who is qualified out of the 2008 election?

Hillary is the same as Obama, but so is McCain when you come down to it. McCain never held a leadership position within the government nor his position in the navy didn't give him the experience to lead a nation no matter what people want to think. So in reality when Obama's lack of experience is brought up, I have to look at his competitors in the race for the WH too.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Well I don't know about the MSN stuff, Fox too has been the same as MSN so they are all the same. Fox in the last few days has been hitting us with the "Jackson" trial and it is another spectacular scene grabbing crap just like their competitors.

BUT with that said something odd struck me when I read this;



I first have to ask, seriously, what makes anyone think that the media wouldn't have been biased against anyone other than Obama?

Before anyone answers this, remember his speech at the 2004 convention?

Remember how the press took it on themselves to be the lead in the Apologetic tour of the US in order to justify our collective self-imposed guilt over our past.

See this means little when people from other countries tell us things we already know but more importantly many seem to be so blind by the problem that we have in our country with race and the apology we continue to make.

The second thing is who is qualified out of the 2008 election?

Hillary is the same as Obama, but so is McCain when you come down to it. McCain never held a leadership position within the government nor his position in the navy didn't give him the experience to lead a nation no matter what people want to think. So in reality when Obama's lack of experience is brought up, I have to look at his competitors in the race for the WH too.

Say what you want about McCain's lack of leadership positions and experience and RINO tendencies,but he trumps Obama in life experience and service to his country by a wide margin. He would have been a much better president than what we got now.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Hell... if that's the case, Eisenhower didn't have enough experience. Neither did Kennedy, LBJ, or Ford. Executive experience isn't the only thing that qualifies for experience, ya know. Being on committees does, to a point. So does actually showing up to vote - unlike Obama. Being a mediocre law professor wouldn't, IMO. Two years in the Senate, with a few years in the state senate... meh... dog catcher has more experience.

So, if the guy was an actual natural born citizen, is 35 yrs old or older, along with the other criteria set up by the Constitution, then he's qualified. Obama was qualified, apparently; because he was elected. But, unlike Hilary, McCain, or practically anyone else who ran, Obama couldn't "experience" his way out of a wet paper bag.

Jimi - "Are you experienced?"
Obama - "I vote present to that question."
 

Refer Hauler

Expert Expediter
You know it's bad when us "just dumb truck drivers" have more business experience and sense than either the President or the VP.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Say what you want about McCain's lack of leadership positions and experience and RINO tendencies,but he trumps Obama in life experience and service to his country by a wide margin. He would have been a much better president than what we got now.

BUT all the service to his country is meaningless when he advocates allowing people who invade our country citizenship on the basis it is the politically expedient way to solve a problem the government created in the first place. And as a so-called leader, he went on the defensive when the people rejected the idea of making invaders citizens at the same time showing contempt for those who are the true hardworking in this country. No matter what someone can point out or try to spin, he is as worthless as most politicians and his leadership skills are poor at best.

No matter, Obama, McCain, palin, whomever ... the idea that we are going to get a person who has experience to be president has to go to the way side as long as we have a one party system - meaning the dems and republicans are both the same with different mascots.

Their experience will not help unless they understand how to delegate but more importantly take responsibility - one thing that FDR, Truman, Eisenhower all had, that quality came out in JFK to an extent and even Johnson and Nixon to a point. But to expect them to "lead" when we haven't had either a leader since Reagan (*yes I think he was to a point) or demand accountability of our elected officials seems to be on the same level as the tooth fairy, a true conservative running or Obama bringing world peace to our door.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
You know it's bad when us "just dumb truck drivers" have more business experience and sense than either the President or the VP.

Oh Pleeze...don't give these guys in here a swollen head....LOL....

I think it is called an opinion column ?
Not a fact column for a reason...:rolleyes:
 
Top