I read the article and became confused, more so than normal. Maybe something got lost in the language translations. Mr. Gorrie (Canadian) tours an Iveco (Italian) in Berlin (German) and Moot (Minnesotan) reads it at home on a Sony (Japanese) while sipping coffee (Columbian). Truly a global economy!
What first confused me was the headline above a picture of a single axle tractor: Can 18-wheel electric trucks be far off. I'll cut the guy some slack on this, being he's a Canadian journalist. And the truck could do duty pulling a tri-axle trailer or a set of doubles.
The next bout of confusion hit me when I read the first 3 sentences:
Inside its cab, the giant truck resembles a nicely appointed apartment.
It boasts comfy chairs, flat-screen TV, ceramic-top stove with overhead fan and light, small sink, refrigerator, dishwasher, heating and air conditioning. The floor is manufactured wood, in light oak; mood lighting abounds.
Can all of those amenities really fit into a single bunk cabover? There is no mention of a bed so I guess all that stuff could fit. I've seen pictures of European luxury apartments and they can do a lot within a small space. I'm thinking about remodeling my broom closet and renting it out. I'll run an ad in the Greenpeace Quarterly Magazine. The ad copy will state: European elegance at section 8 housing prices. This should be appealing to the Obama crowd.
In fact, there are about as many electric trucks as cars in service — albeit, still in small numbers — and their growing numbers counter the perception that battery power is only for flyweights.
This too is a bit confusing for me. Is this world wide, Europe or Canada. I'm sure it doesn't apply to the U.S.
Meanwhile the diesel-fuelled giants are being reconfigured with fuel-saving devices and design tweaks.
Both developments will certainly cut pollution, especially in congested cities, but the real goal is to conserve fuel and money, not the environment.
This paragraph had me so confused I passed out briefly. Mr. Gorrie is an environmental reporter! How can a green weenie make a statement like that without being burned at the stake in an environmentally friendly sort of way using only a large magnifying glass and our good friend Mr. Sun? Environmentalists as of yet don't seemed too concerned about the effects on Mother Earth when it comes to mining the somewhat rare and non-sustainable metals needed to make large batteries.
The fancy truck I've described is called the Glider. Built by Italy's Iveco S.p.A., part of the Fiat Industrial Group, it carries equipment that spokesperson Ivan Calaon says will cut its diesel engine's fuel consumption by 40 per cent.
Two square metres of solar panels on the cab roof produce two kilowatt-hours of electricity on a typical day. More comes from aggressive regenerative braking. And hot exhaust gases fuel what amounts to a small steam-powered generating station.
All of this generates enough electricity to run the truck's lights, pumps, steering and the gadgets inside, leaving the diesel engine with nothing to do except move the truck. Excess electricity is stored for use when the rig isn't running.
The streamlined shape cuts fuel consumption, as do an under-body cover and a fifth wheel that can alter the gap between the tractor and trailer while the truck is moving, to reduce turbulence and drag.
A new cooling system allows the shutters on the grill to be closed for longer periods, which also improves the truck's aerodynamics.
Nothing confusing here. All excellent and practical ideas that could be incorporated into any over the road truck.
Calaon says truckers love it at first sight, although owners will have to weigh the fuel savings against a substantial extra cost.
I would imagine the cost will come down if this truck becomes popular. No mention of the weight of the batteries which could be a major drawback also.
I think it is a nice looking truck, but I have a thing for cabovers. Colonel, got your order in yet?