Big U.S. firms are hiring overseas while cutting jobs at home | MLive.com
Published: Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 12:01 PM Updated: Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 12:21 PM
Jackie Headapohl
Big U.S. multinational corporations are hiring abroad while cutting headcount back home, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.
U.S. Commerce Department data released this week show that U.S. multinational companies, which employ a fifth of all Americans, cut their U.S. headcount by 2.9 million during the 2000s, while hiring 2.4 million people overseas.
In 2009, the companies cut 1.2 million, or 5.3 percent, of their workers in the U.S. and 100,000, or 1.5 percent, of those abroad.
The trend is a switch from a decade earlier in which multinational companies created nearly two jobs in the U.S. for every one job they created overseas.
Why is this happening? The WSJ lists several possible reasons: globalization, rising productivity, a "combination of the U.S. tax code, the declining state of U.S. infrastructure, the quality of the country's education system" or possible a "failure of U.S. policies to counter aggressive foreign governments."
Published: Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 12:01 PM Updated: Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 12:21 PM
Jackie Headapohl
Big U.S. multinational corporations are hiring abroad while cutting headcount back home, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.
U.S. Commerce Department data released this week show that U.S. multinational companies, which employ a fifth of all Americans, cut their U.S. headcount by 2.9 million during the 2000s, while hiring 2.4 million people overseas.
In 2009, the companies cut 1.2 million, or 5.3 percent, of their workers in the U.S. and 100,000, or 1.5 percent, of those abroad.
The trend is a switch from a decade earlier in which multinational companies created nearly two jobs in the U.S. for every one job they created overseas.
Why is this happening? The WSJ lists several possible reasons: globalization, rising productivity, a "combination of the U.S. tax code, the declining state of U.S. infrastructure, the quality of the country's education system" or possible a "failure of U.S. policies to counter aggressive foreign governments."