Assange extradition attempt an uphill struggle, says specialist

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
"A former extradition specialist for the Crown Prosecution Service today predicted it would be "very difficult" for Sweden to get the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, sent back to face sexual assault allegations.

Raj Joshi, a former head of the European and International Division at the CPS, said Sweden's lack of a formal criminal charge against Assange increased his lawyers' chances of success in blocking the extradition attempt.

Assange's lawyers are scheduled to visit him tomorrow in prison for the first time since he was jailed on remand yesterday after Sweden requested his extradition.

Swedish prosecutors say they want to interview Assange about allegations of sexual assault against two women. His lawyers say they fear the US will attempt to extradite him to face charges over the release of hundreds of thousands of secret diplomatic cables though Washington has not so far taken any legal action against him.

Today, a British group campaigning for more rapists to be punished questioned the "unusual zeal" with which Assange, an Australian citizen, was being pursued over the allegations of sexual assault in Sweden.

In a letter to the Guardian, Katrin Axelsson from Women Against Rape said it was routine for people charged with rape in the UK to be granted bail. Assange is yet to be formally charged by the Swedes. Axelsson also said Sweden had a poor record bringing rapists to justice: "Many women in both Sweden and Britain will wonder at the unusual zeal with which Julian Assange is being pursued for rape allegations … There is a long tradition of the use of rape and sexual assault for political agendas that have nothing to do with women's safety."

Assange is due to appear before City of Westminster magistrates's court next Tuesday where his lawyers will attempt to secure his release on bail, a request the court rejected this week.

Assange was arrested by the Metropolitan police's extradition squad on a European arrest warrant issued at the request of Sweden. But Joshi, who headed the CPS's international division for five years, said Sweden faced an uphill battle.

"On what we know so far, it is going to be very difficult to extradite. The judge has to be satisfied that the conduct equals an extraditable offence and that there are no legal bars to extradition.

"Assange's team will argue, how can the conduct equal an extraditable offence if the [Swedish] prosecutor doesn't think there is enough evidence to charge, and still has not charged."

Joshi said other bars to extradition would be Assange's rights under the European human rights legislation.

Assange is being held in Wandsworth prison, south London, where he has limited communication with the outside world. He has no internet access and today was allowed one three minute telephone conversation with his solicitors.

WikiLeaks volunteers today sent him a parcel containing clothes, letters of support, toiletries and a selection of books including one by his barrister Geoffrey Robertson.

Amid suggestions that the US is examining ways to take legal action against Assange, one of his lawyers, Mark Stephens, repeated his claims that Sweden's actions were politically motivated, perhaps as a stalling tactic while the Americans bring a charge: "If there are talks between Sweden and the US for his rendition, we have every reason to be concerned."

As was pointed out in another article I posted: the Swedes are just makin' it up as they go along .... :rolleyes:

I wonder at who's behest ......?

Original article:

Julian Assange extradition attempt an uphill struggle, says specialist
 
Last edited:

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
The whole Swedish rape charge thing smells a little fishy (sorry, couldn't help myself). But that's because we (I) are applying our own "common" sense to the matter. When you find out a little bit more about the whole rape deal in Sweden, it's smells less fishy. Still somewhat weird, maybe, but not as fishy.

Apparently in Sweden, she can seduce you, and you can be well under way, even to the point where you're breathing really funny and your tadpoles are donning snorkels and flippers, and out of nowhere she blows a virtual whistle saying, "That's it! Everybody out of the pool! Adult Swim Only!", then you have to stop whatever you're doing, right then and there, and climb out of the pool. If you don't, from that point on, it's rape.

They want to question him to see if, when she bad her back to him, so to speak, as it were, in the dark, whether or not he crinkled some plastic wrap to make her think he was putting on a shower cap, and it wasn't until after the swim that she discovered the ruse and found out his head was uncovered the entire time.
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
Found this on Sky News which rather contradicts what "The Specialist" says.

Britain's controversial extradition laws have again come under the spotlight with two high-profile cases hitting the headlines

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has pledged to fight being sent to Sweden following allegations of rape, while Bristol businessman Shrien Dewani could be extradited to South Africa after he was accused of paying to have his wife killed

Just weeks after the Government pledged to review extradition rules, both cases have raised further questions about whether it is too easy for other countries to request suspects living in Britain to be sent overseas to face charges.

Experts say that under current rules, there is often little that can be done to resist the process.

Robert Wardle, a consultant at law firm DLA Piper, told Sky News Online that in many cases, countries need to supply hardly any evidence of the alleged crimes before a British judge is obliged to clear the extradition

In the case of Australian-born Mr Assange, Mr Wardle said he may find it difficult to argue against being extradited to Sweden because the country is covered by the "fast-track" European Arrest Warrant (EAW) system.

EAWs, which were introduced six years ago, have been criticised because judges need to consider little more than who the suspect is and what charges they face before the extradition is cleared - generally in a matter of a few weeks.

If Mr Assange's lawyers were to argue that Sweden might be asked to extradite him to the US – a country with the death penalty – on charges relating to leaked diplomatic cables, that would be unlikely to convince a British judge to halt the process, Mr Wardle said.

For Mr Dewani, the process of extraditing him to South Africa would not be as straightforward but Mr Wardle said the claim by a taxi driver that he was involved in his wife Anni's death could be enough for him to be extradited.

"Outside Europe, there may be different extradition agreements with other countries but in a lot of cases not a huge amount of evidence is required," said Mr Wardle.

"Countries need to show there's a prima facie case – so there's got to be some evidence of what they're alleged to have done.

"Unless a person's human rights are at risk, or there are concerns about whether they will have a fair trial, the judge in Britain has no say over stopping the extradition."

Suspects can face the prospect of months in jail in a foreign country if they are charged and bail is refused – something British judges have no control over when granting extraditions

Mr Wardle said: "I think the law is sound as it stands but we should be looking to ensure rights to bail – and I would like to see a scheme whereby people can return home whilst awaiting trial."

Civil rights lobby group Liberty has called on the Government to overhaul what it calls a "rotten" extradition system – starting with a "safeguard" which would give judges greater powers to bar extraditions if a significant part of the alleged crime was carried out in or from the UK.

Home Secretary Theresa May said in September the Government will review current rules amid criticism that arrangements with other countries – particularly the US – make it too easy to transfer suspects.

The Home Office said in September there were concerns that European Arrest Warrants may have stripped power from the British courts.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of rights group Liberty, said at the time: "No one should be parcelled off to a foreign land without due process or when they could be dealt with here at home
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
I'm goin' with the former government dude on this one (yeah, I know - seems odd, considering ....)
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Read it, commented on it. That's part of why I think it smells fishy. But I will concede that it may smell that way to me simply because I don't understand Swedish laws or the Swedish mindset. But still, if not fishy, then it's at least a little weird how this whole thing is playing out.

It might be, but it doesn't make sense that this was orchestrated and Assange was set up by, say, the US, because to orchestrate a bizarre type of a rape charge (consensual but unprotected rape) is (a) likely beyond the capabilities of the US government, and (b) looks like it's a lame attempt at a trumped up charge by the Swedes.

BTW, that NYT link requires a log-in ....
Sorry about that. I've got an account there and forget it requires a login. Here's the entire article that explains the whole mess (sorry again, couldn't help myself).

When Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, asked two Swedish women out on dates in August, he may not have known that Swedish laws protecting women in their sexual encounters include wide-ranging definitions of sexual assault and rape.

Now Mr. Assange, an Australian who is currently in Britain, faces an extradition request from Swedish prosecutors who want to question him on whether separate sexual encounters he had with each of the women became nonconsensual after he was no longer using a condom. Mr. Assange has denied all wrongdoing.

“If he claims that truth and transparency is behind WikiLeaks, he needs to accept the same standards of transparency for himself and come testify,” said Claes Borgstrom, a lawyer representing the two women.

Swedish criminal laws regarding sex offenses are not necessarily all that much stricter than the laws in many other European countries, Mr. Borgstrom said.

But Swedish women, backed by a strong consciousness of women’s rights and a history of a very public discussion of the scourge of sexual violence, may be more willing than most to look to the law for help.

The number of reported rapes in Sweden is by far the highest in the European Union, according to the European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics, which cites 53 offenses per 100,000 inhabitants. Britain has the next highest rate, at 24 per 100,000.

Stefan Lisinski, a veteran crime reporter for the daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter, said he spent between a third to half of his time writing about sexual crimes. Last month a senior police chief was convicted of rape in a high-profile appeals case.

This is most probably not a result of more sexual violence taking place in Sweden, legal experts said, but a result of more crimes being reported.

Some people say, in fact, that if female empowerment — economic, social, and also legal — has a different quality in Sweden than in other countries, it is because men are also at the heart of the gender-equality debate.

Eighty-five percent of Swedish men take parental leave and even conservative male politicians call themselves feminists. With men and women more equal at work and at home, and concerns about the state intruding actively into family and personal affairs long gone, some taboos that may have protected sexual offenders may also be disappearing.
Some people are now lobbying for an additional tightening of the sexual assault and rape laws in Sweden. They contend that the definition of rape should be expanded to include situations in which a woman does not explicitly say no to sex, but clearly signals her opposition in other ways.

“Sometimes we lawyers joke that soon you have to have a written permission before you can have sex,” said Bengt Hesselberg, a defense lawyer with extensive experience in sexual cases. If Sweden’s current criminal code is not much stricter on sexual offenses than those of other European countries, the Swedish laws may be more nuanced, by differentiating among three categories of rape and, unusually, invoking the concept of “unlawful coercion.”

There is a category identified as “severe rape,” which involves a high degree of violence and which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison for the perpetrator; another known as “regular rape,” which may involve some violence and calls for a maximum sentence of six years; and a third called “less severe rape,” which may not involve violence but still includes the imposition of sexual intercourse on a person against her will.

The prosecutors seeking Mr. Assange’s extradition suspect that he may have engaged in this last category, which is punishable by as much as four years in prison.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: December 8, 2010
An earlier version of this article mispelled the name of the lawyer Claes Borgstrom.
Incidentally, I have since found out that only Illinois has the same type of rape laws as Sweden, where consensual sex, at any time during the process that the woman feels like it, becomes rape. Good tip.
 
Top