Search results

Then why is Trump not making that point in court? His conservative, Florida, Trump-appointed judge of choice is giving him every opportunity to do so but Trump is silent on the point you raise.

Let's not forget that had Trump returned the documents when the National Archives asked him to do so months ago, no search would have been necessary or done. But Trump did not return the documents, did he?

No. I mean language taken from the redacted affidavit, a link to which is provided above.

It has been interesting to hear so many try to re-categorize or redefine this situation into something it isn't. In fact, this is a criminal investigation, long underway, that is developing a case and the evidence to support it. As more becomes known, it is looking increasingly likely that...

Good points.

In our small business, we have gradually moved from all-paper records to increasing use of electronic records. While we're not 100% there, I'm looking forward to the day when the business is a paperless operation. Until then, we produce, file and later archive paper records. Having been in...

Wait for what? What will be different when Biden leaves office?

Have you seen the affidavit? Have you read the redacted affidavit released yesterday? What knowledge do you have about the affidavit contents? How do you know it contains false information?

Regarding "personal records," two points. First, unless the FBI occupied Mar-a-Lago for days while a filter team sorted through the boxes that were seized, it was impossible to quickly determine what records were personal and what were illegally possessed government property. We have learned...

That may be true if that was all there was to it, but there is more to it ... much more.

The Documents: Search Warrant and Redacted Affidavit For those who are interested in reading the Mar-a-Lago search warrant and the redacted Mar-a-Lago affidavit without media filter or spin, the links are below: Search Warrant Redacted Affidavit

You will recall that earlier this week, Trump sought out a conservative, Florida, Trump-appointed judge to whom he brought his request that a special master be appointed to examine the materials seized during the Mar-a-Lago search. After reading it, this judge identified several shortcomings in...

You cannot possibly know that "without the redactions, both would be exposed for their dishonesty." The only possible way to know that is to know what the full, unredacted document says; which you don't. You can easily assert dishonesty, but you cannot know the unredacted document will show...

He will defect to Russia before he serves time in a U.S. jail.

Two Predictions 1. Donald Trump will run for President in 2024, likely declaring his candidacy a year earlier. There was never any doubt about this. People who talk about something making it more likely or less likely that hey will run have it wrong. It is 100% likely he will run. It always...

If it can be proven that Trump is guilty of the crimes named in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant and supporting affidavit, attorneys can use it to get The Donald thrown in (to jail).

If the case has merit, it is not immediately evident to the person who matters the most; that is the conservative, Florida judge to who whom Trump brought the case. "On Tuesday, a Florida judge informed two lawyers representing former President Donald Trump, neither of them licensed in the...

Actually, no one can shop for a judge. There are rules in place that determine who gets what judge and when.

I'll wait for the additional information, expected on or before Friday, before I agree or disagree. It is interesting to note that Trump brought this action to a known-conservative, Florida judge who Trump himself appointed. She did not immediately agree that the action has merit. She asked for...

Regarding the delaying action initiated by Trump, you might want to wait until Friday before being so sure. The response he received from a judge today is not encouraging for Trump and his attorneys. The court filing has been declared laughable by some. It is quite something for a judge to ask...