Search results

Yes, it is rational to think that because that's exactly what happened. 30 agents arrived in the morning and left late afternoon and there was no news about that until after they left.

There will be a lot of ink spilled and breathless commentary about the empty folders. I'm not focusing much on those as the empty folders are not a substantial part of the bigger story. It would be if evidence surfaced showing the folders contained classified documents that were improperly...

Yes, Turtle, that is correct. That's what happened and your Schorsch report is accurate. But as soon as the story started to come out, Trump jumped in and it exploded because the whole world had it straight from the horse's mouth. I accept your clarification to my report. Danthewolf00's account...

Another Blunder https://www.businessinsider.com/empty-classified-folder-on-display-at-trump-tower-bar-msnbc-2022-9

Let's all hope Trump keeps up his social media posts. Indeed, lets hope he increases his pace. His public posts are all admissible in court.

Your timing is off. If you insist on clinging to your false narrative, that's your bed to sleep in.

Kindly review the news of that day. DOJ quietly conducted the search and left the grounds. No media was present anytime during the search. The search became breaking news when Trump himself posted about it on social media, thereby breaking the story. The news broke in the evening during the...

Thank you, RLENT, for pointing us toward the transcript. Do you happen to know of a good place online to see all the court documents concerning Donald J. Trump v. The United States? For future reference, I'd like to compile a list of those documents and links to them. TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION TO...

They may already have and searches may already have been conducted. We would not know about any such searches unless Trump broadcasts that news out like he did about the Mar-a-Lago search.

What goes around comes around. https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/03/politics/trump-jail-sentences-mishandled-classified-information-kfile/index.html

When I was an infantry officer, if I wanted an order to be obeyed, I gave it in a way that it would be received and understood. So too the the president. When you expect other people to act on your orders and make happen what you want to happen, you can't just think stuff up and call it good. I...

I think it is helpful to distinguish between wishful thinking and actual deeds. If my house is burning, I can imagine calling the fire department. I can even say to myself and others I called the fire department. But the fire department is a real entity in the real world and it does not know...

You make your point well. I'm not going to fully agree with you about the role of orignialism, but the Bryer "argument" you share above is not a legal argument at all.

Did the documents actually become declassified? Do they now exist in the public domain in unredacted form?

More About The Courts Just an additional thought about the courts. One of the reasons we have the courts at all is because it is not always clear how the law applies. A current example is crypto. Crypto is a new form of currency, made possible by technology the nation's founders could not have...

The "so what" is the tweets had no legal effect. They were tweets, not official actions. Another "so what" is those tweets may come back to bite Trump. They indicate his knowledge that there is a distinct process for declassifying documents. So far, at least, he has been unable to produce any...

About This Judge Cannon I said earlier that I had an open mind about this judge who is hearing and about to rule in Donald J. Trump v. The United States. When she signaled her "preliminary intent" to give Trump what he wants (a special master to screen documents seized in the Mar-a-Lago...

Yes. Every higher-court ruling that is not unanimous has dissenting opinions in which conflicting views are stated. But in all of them, the judges do their best to base their views on the law. The reason we have courts in the first place is the application of the law is not always clear. The...

And that, my friend, is why I so love the courts. A good judge will consider the law and the facts, not the biases of the person submitting the brief. It is obvious the "anti-Trumpers," as you call them, have a point of view; a bias in a certain direction. They flat-out state it in their brief...

Amicus Brief Filed in the Donald J. Trump v. The United States As Judge Cannon does her homework and crafts her ruling regarding Trump's request for a special master, she will have this amicus brief to use as a resource. "An amicus curiae is an individual or organization who is not a party to...