Search results

This article begins with "When someone accuses you of whataboutism, you can be pretty certain you are right and they can’t refute it." My response is, if you are engaging in whataboutism, I can be pretty certain you are incapable of or you are not interested in advancing a logical argument that...

What about Trump? He is famous for his thousands of lies. Your failure to mention Trump totally invalidates your thesis, does it not? Just kidding. I'm simply making my same point in a different way. Using whataboutism, I don't have to answer anything you say. I need only change the subject to...

Sad but true. However, Speaker McCarthy has said, “If for some way when we go through Ethics and he has broken the law, then we will remove him,..." (Source) Until McCarthy and the House Republicans say otherwise.

If you say so. I say otherwise. Whataboutism is a fallacy, not a valid argument. I don't want to make points by changing the subject to something else. If I say Bob is a bad guy, I don't talk about Steve. I highlight Bob's words, actions and failures to act to make my point.

Wrong again. I have said the Biden documents thing should be investigated by DOJ and I have pointed out that a special counsel has been appointed for that very purpose. That's all good with me. Where crimes are committed, crimes should be investigated and prosecuted. That's not about Democrats...

I'd have to go back to double check my previous posts, but I don't think I have ever called for any member of congress to quit.

You truly love the "whatabout" method, don't you? While it is logically fallacious, you use it often. Whatever is said about a Republican, you immediately change the subject and talk about someone or something else. Trump this .... well what about Hillary? Santos this .... well what about...

I think you're right. Massive blunder by Democrats to lose this seat. They failed to do opposition research, or if they did do it, they failed to use it. Also, several blue US House seats flipped to red partly, if not mostly, because of New York's truly stupid policy of releasing offenders...

Because his lies and hypocrisy are easily demonstrable, and they LOVE how the Republican party defends this guy and keeps him seated as one of their elected officials. It's a delightful campaign bonus for every Democrat who will run against a Republican US House incumbent in 2024. For the...

Nice to see you have it all figured out.

Good point. A valid question to raise.

I'm not sure how to properly characterize Pence's and Biden's apparent mishandling of the documents found in their possession. We'll know more about that as investigations proceed and more information becomes available. Reckless may be the appropriate term, or not. It depends on what comes out...

Truth Social Update "Both platforms were powerful tools for his earlier campaigns; he had more than 35 million followers on Facebook and 88.7 million on Twitter. On Truth Social, which was set up in late 2021, he has just 4.2 million followers. His posts there have limited visibility beyond his...

Note This There is no evidence Pence and Biden knew they had classified documents among their many papers. There is substantial evidence Trump did know. That is one of the many differences in these cases.

Sound Familiar? "A lawyer for former Vice President Mike Pence discovered about a dozen documents marked as classified at Pence’s Indiana home last week, and he has turned those classified records over to the FBI, ..." (Source) We can only surmise that the Pence home has been carefully...

It is possible, but not yet proven true in court. That's exactly why DOJ is not only investigating this but has assigned a special prosecutor to do so.

Possibilities and probabilities are not developed facts. They speak to something that may or may not happen. And the only way to make such things real as if they are developed facts is with a leap of faith or with flawed logic. I have no doubt that you believe Biden is capable of the sanitizing...

I expected something like that to be brought up. The notable differences I mentioned are easily verifiable. The difference you bring up is an assumption or assertion. One thing I have learned how to do over the years is not make assumptions that may be without grounds and then get mad about...

Two Juries Convict More Trump Supporters of Jan. 6 Crimes https://apnews.com/article/biden-political-and-civil-unrest-united-states-government-legal-proceedings-crime-1b438dad382b530e0aadc195c9b51492...

Biden's Delaware home was recently searched by the FBI. danthewolf00 is correct. Additional documents were found. That means both Biden's and Trump's home have been searched by the FBI. The two notable differences are: 1. Biden requested the search and gave permission. No search warrant was...