Search results

You are using a term I have not heard before. What is "lawfare?"

That may be, which only reinforces my point. The only way for DeSantis to knock Trump off his perch will be to treat Trump like Trump has treated DeSantis. I may be wrong about DeSantis. He may continue to bend over and take it from Trump. We'll find out after he officially declares. My guess is...

That can be done. How much more are you willing to pay for your food to help make this happen? How much do wages and benefits need to increase to get US citizens doing backbreaking work in the hot Florida sun and fields?

That's not the point of my post. DeSantis made an unscheduled stop in Des Moines to mock Trump's excuse. It does not matter if Trump's excuse was valid or invalid. DeSantis seized an opportunity to mock Trump. DeSantis is starting to show some teeth. If he declares his candidacy, as he is...

I know you believe that. I don't. I have more faith in the justice system than you do. Lately, Trump has lost in blue zip codes. And he has lost when his cases are appealed and heard directly buy judges nominated by Trump himself. When you see that happening, it compels a reasonable person to...

DeSantis made an unscheduled stop in Des Moines to draw attention to Trump's lame excuse.

Either way, Trump lost. He has lawyers up the wazoo and unlimited resources with which to defend himself and he mounted no defense, and he lost.

DeSants Scores in Iowa, Taunts Trump https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/14/us/politics/desantis-impresses-in-iowa-showing-up-an-absent-trump.html

As Expected, Trump Appeals Carroll v. Trump Verdict https://www.axios.com/2023/05/11/donald-trump-e-jean-carroll-verdict-appeal

You defend the same way the plaintiff asserts. She succeeded because she showed up. Trump failed because he didn't. There are other defamation trials and allegations of sexual abuse in the pipeline. We'll see if Trump shows up for those.

That's part of the story, yes. And what you say is true. The rest of the story, also true, is the jury found Trump liable for defamation and sexual abuse, and ordered Trump to pay Carroll $5 million in damages. The abuse and defamation did happen, the jury decided. And Trump made no defense...

Don't forget about the fact that Trump did not offer a defense in the Carroll case. His attorneys only tried to discredit the case Carroll made. When you do not appear in court to mount a defense and do not have your attorneys do so, it kinda tilts the scale against you.

As With Carroll, So Too With Zervos and Several Others? From Google Bard: Summer Zervos v. Donald Trump is a defamation lawsuit that was filed in New York state court in 2017. Zervos, a former contestant on The Apprentice, alleges that Trump defamed her when he denied her allegation that he...

Trump's Crib-Kill Efforts Continue Trump is clearly working hard to kill the DeSantis campaign in its crib. Here in Florida, I saw another harsh Anti-DeSantis ad on TV this morning. It's no accident that Trump is holding a rally in Iowa the same day De'Santis is in the state. Trump will not...

If this law is enforced, it will directly and negatively impact our business. We are planning to remodel our facility in the near future. It's never been easy to find fully staffed contractors for jobs like this. It may get even harder if the law is enforced.

Here's an interesting observation about the Trump/CNN Town Hall ratings: "At a time when CNN has been struggling to turn around viewership decline, the telecast proved to be a ratings disappointment, with Nielsen reporting just 3.1 million viewers overall. That was a big boost over CNN’s...

That too is false. If you have not yet investigated ChatGPT, I encourage you to do so. This artificial intelligence app is rapidly changing how people do their research and work in all domains of life. That's not because ChatGPT "knows" little. It's because ChatGPT's capabilities are nothing...

You're highlighting that Pomerantz "took the Fifth." If your implication is there is something wrong with that, I'd ask you to explain why it's wrong for Pomerantz but presumably OK for Trump. When Trump did it, you said not a word about it.

I asked ChatGPT this: "Was there ever a time when for every 2 judges that were picked by Republicans, the Democrats could pick one of their own?" ChatGPT replied: "There has never been a formal arrangement or agreement between Democrats and Republicans to confirm judges on a specific ratio...

Citing a TV host and claiming he would know is insufficient. How do you know if he knows or not? This is a simple question, easily answered with objectively verifiable information. . While it was once true that an arrangement existed between Democrats and Republicans such that the majority party...